Mason City Iowa

Topic: In surveys, Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes little of its budget to maintaining riverside recreational facilities. For years there have been complaints from residents about the quality of the river’s water and the river’s smell. In response, the state has recently announced plans to clean up Mason River. Use of the river for water sports is therefore sure to increase. The city government should for that reason devote more money in this year’s budget to riverside recreational facilities.

Write a response in which you examine the stated and/or unstated assumptions of the argument. Be sure to explain how the argument depends on the assumptions and what the implications are if the assumptions prove unwarranted.

Explanation of Score Your essay will be evaluated for its overall quality, based on how well you do the following: respond to the specific task directions consider the complexities of the issue, or identify and analyze important features of the argument organize, develop, and express your ideas support your ideas with relevant reasons and examples control the elements of standard written English. A well-written response clearly communicates your message or ideas to a reader. Be sure your essay clearly relates to the question you have chosen to write on. Also, in presenting and developing your response, please be sure to address the specific task instructions. Use appropriate, specific details to support your thesis or to develop your ideas. These may include facts, dates, or names specific examples, or personal experience explanations or descriptions. No outside sources required and refrain from abbreviations. Think about the best way to organize your response: A reader should be able to follow your ideas, explanations, and arguments without becoming confused. Think about the order in which you present your information. Think about the best way to indicate connections among your ideas. Use the English language appropriately by making sure you have: use words that express the ideas you want to communicate used the correct forms of words used correct sentence structure used sentence structure that expresses the ideas you want to communicate. Be sure to review your response for errors in word forms and grammar, punctuation, capitalization, spelling. Although the GRE® Analytical Writing section contains two discrete tasks, a single combined score is reported because it is more reliable than is a score for either task alone. The reported score, the average of the scores for the two tasks, ranges from 0 to 6, in half-point increments. The statements below describe, for each score level, the overall quality of critical thinking and analytical writing demonstrated across both the Issue and Argument tasks. As the name suggests, the Analytical Writing section is designed to assess both critical thinking skills and writing ability. Thus, many aspects of analytical writing, including reasoning skills, organization, and degree of control of the conventions of standard written English are taken into consideration in the determination of a final score. For a full description of how these criteria are used to assess essay responses, please refer to the scoring guides for the Issue and Argument tasks, which are available on the GRE website at www.ets.org/gre/revised/scoreguides

Analyze an Argument Scoring Guide
Score 6 – Outstanding
In addressing the specific task directions, a 6 response presents a cogent, well-articulated examination of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.
A typical response in this category
clearly identifies aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task and examines them insightfully
develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically, and connects them with clear transitions
provides compelling and thorough support for its main points
conveys ideas fluently and precisely, using effective vocabulary and sentence variety
demonstrates superior facility with the conventions of standard written English (i.e., grammar, usage, and mechanics) but may have minor errors
Score 5 – Strong
In addressing the specific task directions, a 5 response presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed examination of the argument and conveys meaning clearly.
A typical response in this category
clearly identifies aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task and examines them in a generally perceptive way
develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically, and connects them with appropriate transitions
offers generally thoughtful and thorough support for its main points
conveys ideas clearly and well, using appropriate vocabulary and sentence variety
demonstrates facility with the conventions of standard written English but may have minor errors
Score 4 – Adequate
In addressing the specific task directions, a 4 response presents a competent examination of the argument and conveys meaning with acceptable clarity.
A typical response in this category
identifies and examines aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task but may also discuss some extraneous points
develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily but may not connect them with transitions
supports its main points adequately but may be uneven in its support
demonstrates sufficient control of language to convey ideas with acceptable clarity
generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English but may have some errors
Score 3 – Limited
A 3 response demonstrates some competence in addressing the specific task directions, in examining the argument, and in conveying meaning but is obviously flawed.
A typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
does not identify or examine most of the aspects of the argument relevant to the assigned task, although some relevant examination of the argument is present
mainly discusses tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
is limited in the logical development and organization of ideas
offers support of little relevance and value for its main points
has problems in language and sentence structure that result in a lack of clarity
contains occasional major errors or frequent minor errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that can interfere with meaning
Score 2 – Seriously Flawed
A 2 response largely disregards the specific task directions and/or demonstrates serious weaknesses in analytical writing.
A typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
does not present an examination based on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views on the subject
does not follow the directions for the assigned task
does not develop ideas, or is poorly organized and illogical
provides little, if any, relevant or reasonable support for its main points
has serious problems in language and sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
contains serious errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that frequently obscure meaning
Score 1 – Fundamentally Deficient
A 1 response demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing.
A typical response in this category exhibits ONE OR MORE of the following characteristics:
provides little or no evidence of understanding the argument
provides little evidence of the ability to develop an organized response (i.e., is disorganized and/or extremely brief)
has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
contains pervasive errors in grammar, usage, or mechanics that result in incoherence
Score 0
Off-topic (i.e., provides no evidence of an attempt to respond to the assigned topic), in a foreign language, merely copies the topic, consists of only keystroke characters, or is illegible, or nonverbal. For more information on  check on this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mason_City,_Iowa

Get 20% Discount on This Paper
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Try it now!

Get 20% Discount on This Paper

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:
$0.00

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

Australia Assessments has gained an international reputation of being the leading website in custom assignment writing services. Once you give us the instructions of your paper through the order form, we will complete the rest.

Essays

Essay Writing Services

As we work towards providing the best custom assignment services, our company provides assignment services for any type of academic essay. We will help you develop professionally written essays that are rich in content and free from plagiarism.

Admissions

Admission and Business Papers

Our skilled team of professional writers will ensure that we help you craft a remarkable admission essay for your desired Master's program in your institution of choice. We won't stop there. Once you enter the job market, we will be available to secure you a position at your desired worksite by creating an outstanding portfolio or resume.

Editing

Editing and Proofreading

Our editorial team is always available for all editing and proofreading services. They check completed papers by our writers and also provide professional opinions to papers completed by our clients.

Coursework

Technical papers

We harbor professional academic writers with different qualifications in diverse academic fields. As such, we are capable of handling both simple and technical papers. Ensure that you provide us with correct and complete instructions in the order form.